Return-Path: <andrew@andrewwatters.com>
Received: from [192.168.2.65] (23-118-250-105.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [23.118.250.105])
        by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k4sm6579363pfk.44.2021.01.28.13.45.35
        for <sethwiener@yahoo.com>
        (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Thu, 28 Jan 2021 13:45:35 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Notice of Motion for Sanctions, Meet and Confer Letter re
 Demurrer to Cross-Complaint
To: Seth Wiener <sethwiener@yahoo.com>
References: <227709697.988331.1611863589155.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
 <227709697.988331.1611863589155@mail.yahoo.com>
 <a2916b60-1917-a766-d9c5-7d6e500ade9f@andrewwatters.com>
 <1287390112.989435.1611864513528@mail.yahoo.com>
 <fe7c8140-9d2c-9b76-fd3c-8b5202eb1bf1@andrewwatters.com>
 <322847490.232822.1611865625682@mail.yahoo.com>
From: "Andrew G. Watters" <andrew@andrewwatters.com>
Message-ID: <021f3d17-95be-7a33-8d62-d19ba91009cc@andrewwatters.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 13:45:34 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <322847490.232822.1611865625682@mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

No, you are wrong.  But hey, it doesn't really matter to me since your 
motion will be thrown out as a result.  By all means, feel free attempt 
to proceed with your 128.5 without giving me your actual motion.

As for the responses, what are you talking about?  I sent you the 
supplemental responses on the agreed-upon date and I don't recall 
hearing anything further.

My assistant and I both got COVID-19 and we have been trying to get some 
additional documents out for you, but it's been very difficult due to 
restrictions from the health department.  We reopen on Monday and I 
would say next week is realistic.

Andrew G. Watters
andrew@andrewwatters.com
+1 (415) 261-8527
https://www.andrewwatters.com

On 1/28/2021 12:27 PM, Seth Wiener wrote:
> Andrew,
> 
> You are simply wrong that the full motion is required.  The section 
> makes clear that only  a notice of motion needs to be served.
> 
> I also have not received any supplemental discovery responses from you.  
> Please let me know if you intend to provide any.
> 
> 
> 
> Law Offices of Seth W. Wiener
> 609 Karina Court
> San Ramon, CA 94582
> (925) 487-5607
> www.sethwienerlaw.com
> 
> 
> 
> [snip]
